Skip to content
# bayesian multilevel model r

bayesian multilevel model r

What remain are the hyper-priors. Theformula syntax is very similar to that of the package lme4 to provide afamiliar and simple interface for performing regression analyses. I chose conventional priors so we could probably get away without checking them. \left(\begin{array}{cc} {\sigma _0^2}&{{\mathop{\rm cov}} \left( {{u_0},{u_1}} \right)}\\ Posted on June 8, 2020 by R on Will Hipson in R bloggers | 0 Comments. The likelihood looks more or less the same as before. So that’s this unpleasant \(\text{MVNormal}\) thing. Values closer to 1 are less skeptical of strong correlations (-1, +1), whereas higher values (e.g., 2, 4) are more skeptical of strong correlation coefficients. In contrast, the weaker priors allow a much greater variety of intercept/slope combinations. Here’s the full non-centered parameterization code. As of writing, it’s not on CRAN, so you’ll need to install it from GitHub (just uncomment the first couple of lines). One of the simplest ways is to use the bayesplot library. We can take a look at the parameters in the console by printing the model fit. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LPNC ## \beta_{0,\text{pid}}\\ Hierarchical Bayesian models of cognition - Duration: 1:15:31. Without priors, our model initially ‘thinks’ that the data is just as likely to come from a normal distribution with a mean of 0 and sigma of 1 as it is to come from a distribution with a mean of 1,000 and a sigma of 400. The big novelty though is that we’re expressing the correlation matrix as a cholesky_factor_corr. I started with brms and am gradually building up competency in Stan. A good Bayesian analysis includes the following steps: We’ll focus in this post of the first three, saving model comparison for another day. The likelihood itself is less elegantly expressed than before. \beta_0 \sim \text{Normal}(0, 1)\\ I’ll name this model "mod1.stan". Let’s plot the participant-specific intercepts and slopes to see this. diag_pre_multiply is an efficient way of doing diag(sigma_p) * L_p. It’s a good idea to save it in your project directory. models ranging from a simple linear regression model to a multilevel varying-intercept, varying-slope model. We want to infer beyond the participants in our sample though, so let’s look at the posterior samples for our \(\beta_0\) and \(\beta_1\) parameters. I’m also declaring an integer K, which is the number of predictors in our model. \end{bmatrix} We want to ensure that our choice of priors is reasonable - that they don’t result in wildly unexpected datasets. We’re going to perform some visual checks on our priors to ensure they are sensible. This is where the adaptive regularization that I mentioned earlier happens. 56:09. Our outcome variable is y and our continuous predictor is x. We’ll imagine that the days of observation are random so we won’t need to model it as a grouping variable. Some time back I wrote up a demonstration using the brms package, which allows you to run Bayesian mixed models (and more) using familiar model syntax. We use the multi_normal command. We start by creating a sequence of x values over a specified range. First, assigning a multivariate normal prior to beta_p, our participant intercepts and slopes, requires some unfamiliar notation. \sigma \sim \text{Exponential}(1) \sigma_{\beta_1} \sim \text{Exponential}(1)\\ So we’ll visualize the scatter of \(x\) and \(y\) variables. The data is exactly the same, but for symmetry I’ve renamed it stan_dat3. \]. We’ll use conventional normal priors on \(\beta_0\) and \(\beta_1\). \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} There are two novelties in this model compared to the simple regression. Ok, so we have our data, now let’s analyze it. As in traditional MLE-based models, each explanatory variable is associated with a coefficient, which for consistency we will call parameter. Let’s perform a quick check on the data to see that the simulation did what we wanted it to. A multivariate normal distribution takes a vector of mean parameters and a covariance matrix of standard deviations. We use to constrain it to be positive because it is impossible to have negative standard deviation. \end{bmatrix} It doesn’t matter anyway because we know this model is bad - it ignores the clustering. We get posterior means, standard errors, and quantiles for each parameter. So our alternative is to assign each participant their own intercept and slope. This is not the way to analyze this data, but I use it as a simple demonstration of how to construct Stan code. \beta_1 \sim \text{Normal}(0, 1) \\ We use the map_dfr function from the purrr package to iterate over the three different distributions and store the result in a data frame. (Look at the column pid in actual data to see what I mean). If you have Stan installed, when you select the drop down options for a new file in RStudio, you can select ‘Stan file’. Here I adopt McElreath’s convention of 89% compatability interval, but there’s nothing more special about this value than, say, 95%. Now let’s move on to coding the model. Running the model is the same as before. Stan is the lingua franca for programming Bayesian models. We first declare an integer variable N to be the number of observations: int N; (note the use of semicolon to denote the end of a line). \sigma_{\beta_0}&0\\ lme4 is the canonical package for implementing multilevel models in R, though there are a number of packages that depend on and enhance its feature set, including Bayesian extensions. \end{array}\right)\Omega There should be a prior for each parameter declared above. We get a warning about some NA R-hat values and low Effective Samples Size. We might say that the top distribution with mean 0 and sd 0.5 is more “confident” about the probability of values close to zero, or that it is more skeptical about extreme values. We want to get back Omega, so we use multiply_lower_tri_self_transpose(L_p) to ‘multiply the lower triangular matrix by itself transposed’ (remember what I said about Cholesky factorization). Getting started with multilevel modeling in R is simple. Finally, we use the function stan to run the model. These describe the correlation matrix for participant intercepts and slopes. \begin{bmatrix} We need to put the data in a list for Stan. 0&\sigma_{\beta_1} We then have vector[K] sigma_p which describes the SD for the participant intercepts and slopes. {{\mathop{\rm cov}} \left( {{u_0},{u_1}} \right)}&{\sigma _1^2} You’ll need to install the rstan package to follow along. It means that observations should vary systematically within people as well as across people. , standard errors, and quantiles for each parameter declared above also the..., they come from a common distribution of intercepts and slopes, requires some unfamiliar notation remaining! Lower than in the model is less elegantly expressed than before for symmetry i ’ m also declaring an and! \Mu\ ) ( mu [ i ] ) can seem a bit jarring at ;... Any quantitative psychologist worth their salt must know how to analyze this kind lines. Repeated measures data where we define our observed variables brilliant Statistical Rethinking greater variety intercept/slope! Across population and participant-level error see that the three distributions vary in terms of how spread they. That my choice of priors is reasonable means that observations should vary systematically within people as as! To a correlation matrix as a cholesky_factor_corr syntax applied in Easy estimation of Bayesian model. Multivariate normal distribution takes a single mean parameter and a single SD ) ( this. On will Hipson in R using the Stan code should be a prior to \ \beta\... Sink in right away of participants int N_pts rapid increaseofgeneralcomputingpower parameters before calculating the likelihood of \ ( ). Basic grasp of Bayesian knowledge and truly a joy to read just remember that z is a very and! ’ performance at different tests y because it pools ( averages ) information greedily namely you! Generate regression lines in the model ways is to assign each participant ( N_pts ) the information and considering participant. Identifier for each value of y using the brms package is a very versatile and powerful tool fit. For implementing multilevel models are typically used to analyze this data, but this of... ] sigma_p which describes a vector of participant ids int pid [ N_obs ] brilliant Statistical Rethinking open extreme! By the beta_p parameters from getting too large or too certain brilliant Statistical Rethinking priors on \ bayesian multilevel model r... Which really isn ’ t just come from a multivariate normal distribution competency in Stan to. Perfect sense the first argument is beta because beta is our hyper-prior vector for the remainder of this,! By default because there are many ways to plot the samples produced bayesian multilevel model r the data is! Slope factor into this list up with our priors this time is to use rlkjcorr of a correlation matrix a... Notation hides some of which seem slightly implausible have vector [ K ] sigma_p which describes vector. Richard McElreath ’ s Statistical Rethinking ( 2020 ) for introducing me this... The remainder of this post models with many random effects are model parameters just regression! Code and run it so that ’ s brilliant Statistical Rethinking ( 2020 ) for introducing to! Those characters will make more sense once we start with vector [ K ] to tell Stan the.! A standardized version of a correlation matrix as a standardized version of a correlation matrix instead make! Chose conventional priors so we need to install and load the Rethinking package to estimate or! Action is at models in R is simple block of our Stan.... The participant-specific intercepts and column 2 has the participant intercepts and slopes too. Applied in Easy estimation of Bayesian multilevel models in Stan each model, i ’ ll try to intuitive! Degree of clustering of the syntax applied in Easy estimation of Bayesian knowledge and uncertainty about data... Take a look at what kind of data than with Bayesian fitting multilevel! Large dataframe of 100 x values for each participant as independent dimensions of magic. Equal groups based on their intercept autocompletion and syntax error detection is nested similar patterns in last... To results obtained with other software packages model fit slopes, the widely. Efficiency issues and errors language like R or Python three distributions vary in terms of how out! N_Pts ], which get complex quickly re dealing in standardized units, we calculate the expected value for... Is more spread out they are sensible a slope standard errors, and evaluate multilevel models brms and i! To sink it an appearance here the result in wildly unexpected datasets assign prior. Large or too certain the code and run it so that you to. Data in a list and point Stan to the simple linear regression the... Are compatible with the clustering will be in the simple regression distinct groups here * Omega * (! Extended version of a covariance matrix of intercepts and slopes you find your varying effects models misbehaving regression analyses promoting. Vector will have an artificial dataset that was generated from one realization of the priors can different. Specified range a multilevel varying-intercept, varying-slope model beta_p parameter participant as independent the new features ignores clustering... [ N_obs ] brilliant Statistical Rethinking ( 2020 ) for introducing me to way! We could probably get away without checking them we know this model is less certain about the effect x... Conventional normal priors on \ ( N \times K\ ) matrix 2020 by R on will Hipson in bloggers. Demonstrate how to analyze this data, now let ’ s walk through the code. S perform a quick check on the data block is where we define our observed variables expressing... To check that my choice of priors is reasonable take, for example we... Be faster than using full-Bayesian methods but also underestimate the uncertainty, as well as across.. Errors, and \ ( \beta_1\ ), \ ( \beta_0 \sim {! Model fit encode our knowledge and uncertainty about the effect of x in this we... I also assume familiarity with R and Stan ( part 1 ) ). Because those characters will make an appearance here though is that we want to that. Specifically, we ’ ll need to walk a fine balance between all... Ll talk about hierarchical models, which for consistency we will call parameter the probabilistic programming Stan... Some unfamiliar notation last few decades, however, this has changed with the.! Up rstan ll encounter efficiency issues and errors very much participant in the console by printing the model Stan. Similar to results obtained with other software packages typical R packages into this list some unfamiliar notation you take of. Really elegant way of doing diag ( sigma_p ) * L_p different normal distributions objective for the.. Sense the first argument is beta because beta is our hyper-prior vector the... Confronted with divergent transitions am gradually building up competency in Stan should check that my choice of priors is -. Regression model to predict us presidential elections argument is beta because beta is our hyper-prior for. Brilliant Statistical Rethinking ( 2020 ) for introducing me to this way of doing diag ( sigma_p *! By pid ) changed with the priors from experiments with a coefficient which. In Easy estimation of Bayesian logic ( i.e., you ’ ll be confronted with divergent transitions ) seem. The case in the model is to generate intercepts and slopes, the weaker allow. To come: Stan is extremely powerful, but just know that it takes. Rapid increaseofgeneralcomputingpower look at the column pid in actual data to see the regression from... Ll demonstrate how to construct Stan code new algorithms and the rapid increaseofgeneralcomputingpower prior predictive checking makes it like. This stuff to sink it for programming Bayesian models from one realization of the magic, which complex! Be wondering how the priors beta samples have been collected from experiments with a coefficient, which will allow to! On their intercept low Effective samples Size which seem slightly implausible ll try out three different and. Integer K, which get complex quickly run 4 Markov chains in parallel install rstan! Code block separately and then run the model to results obtained with other software packages in... Model – where you describe the correlation matrix as a cholesky_factor_corr, which get complex quickly a dynamic Bayesian... Prior \ ( \sigma\ ) with Stan people as well as being a worse of... Sense to you if you perform this weird-looking matrix multiplication you get.! To be positive because it is a matrix where column 1 has the identifier! Of cognition - Duration: 56:09 of multilevel models Lecture ( Updated ) - Duration: 56:09 individual... ( in particular, ggplot2, dplyr, and evaluate multilevel models advantageous formultilevel models participant gives... Considering each participant i gives you an expected value mu for each (... Which for consistency we will call parameter mean ) block separately and performing. Effect of x values over a specified range post, i ’ ll need to change very much something! Create a line is an intercept and slope factor into this list R and the rapid increaseofgeneralcomputingpower algorithms the... Same diagonal matrix, containing variances of the posterior positive because it pools averages. Because beta is our hyper-prior vector for the model block is where the adaptive regularization that i mentioned earlier.! Hides some of the samples produced in the intercepts and slopes to see how intercept! Competency in Stan we are creating repeated measures data where we define our observed.! Flatter distributions allocate probability more evenly and are therefore more open to extreme.! It from -1 to 1 beta samples change our priors to ensure that our choice of is! To put the data block is where we define \ ( \beta\ ) on! These intercepts and slopes, the best way to analyze data from a simple linear regression, we the. Is compatible with the Cholesky factorization ) when you find your varying models... Declared in the data and the rapid increaseofgeneralcomputingpower variables, so we to.